The marketplace of ideology: “Elective affinities” in political psychology and their implications for consumer behavior
نویسنده
چکیده
An abundance of research in political psychology demonstrates that leftists and rightists (or liberals and conservatives) diverge from one another in terms of: (a) personality characteristics; (b) cognitive processing styles; (c) motivational interests and concerns; (d) the prioritization of personal values; and (e) neurological structures and physiological functions. In this article, I summarize these findings and discuss some of their implications for persuasion, framing, and advertising; consumer choice, judgment, decision-making, and behavior; and customer satisfaction/ dissatisfaction and politically motivated boycotts. I conclude that the theory and practice of consumer psychology will be enriched by taking into account ideological asymmetries and the ways in which human behavior both reflects and gives rise to left–right divergence in political orientation—not only in terms of beliefs, opinions, and values but also in terms of underlying psychological processes. © 2017 Society for Consumer Psychology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities.
Ideology has re-emerged as an important topic of inquiry among social, personality, and political psychologists. In this review, we examine recent theory and research concerning the structure, contents, and functions of ideological belief systems. We begin by defining the construct and placing it in historical and philosophical context. We then examine different perspectives on how many (and wh...
متن کاملManipulation of Ideology in Translation of Political Texts: A Criti-cal Discourse Analysis Perspective
As a culture-based phenomenon which involves both linguistic and social aspects, translation has been investigated from various perspectives. The present Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)-based study is an attempt to probe into the manipulation of ideologies in translations of political texts. A CDA approach, based on Fairclough (1989), Van Dijk (2004) and Farahzad (2007), was adopted to conduc...
متن کاملA Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Implications in Three Persian Translations of “Animal Farm”
This study draws on a comparative framework to evaluate the translation of political implications in three Persian translations of the novellaAnimal Farm (by George Orwell), using Fairclough’scritical discourse analysis (CDA) model. The study regards political implications and ideologies as a mode of background knowledge shared by writers and audiences in the source language. Fairclough’s mode...
متن کاملپیشایندها و پسایندهای رفتار خرید ناگهانی: تعیین اولویتها و ارائه مدل با استفاده از روش ترکیبی دلفی و دیمتل
Impulse buying behavior is a highly emotional activation, low cognitive control, and to a large extent a reaction that is critical to consumer behavior. This research examines the antecedents and implications of purchasing behavior through identification and ranking of the most important factors affecting impulse buying behavior. By studying the previously performed researches, the determinants...
متن کاملA Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Iranian and Saudi Arabian Print Media on Civil War in Syria
Abstract This study tried to examine the relationship between language strategies/sources and ideologies, and how ideologies are constructed and expressed through language strategies in different English newspapers with different political contexts. The focus of the study was on the style of representation of Syrian civil war in Tehran-Times and Asharq Al-Awsat newspapers. The data from these n...
متن کامل